The Usefulness of X-ray Diffraction and Thermal Analysis to Study Dietary Supplements Containing Iron

X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and thermal analysis (differential scanning calorimetry/derivative of thermogravimetry (DSC/DTG)) are solid-state techniques that can be successfully used to identify and quantify various chemical compounds in polycrystalline mixtures, such as dietary supplements or drugs. In this work, 31 dietary supplements available on the Polish market that contain iron compounds, namely iron gluconate, fumarate, bisglycinate, citrate and pyrophosphate, were evaluated. The aim of the work was to identify iron compounds declared by the manufacturer as food supplements and to try to verify compliance with the manufacturer’s claims. Studies performed by X-ray and thermal analysis confirmed that crystalline iron compounds (iron (II) gluconate, iron (II) fumarate), declared by the manufacturers, were present in the investigated dietary supplements. Iron (II) bisglycinate proved to be semi-crystalline. However, depending on the composition of the formulation, it was possible to identify this compound in the tested supplements. For amorphous iron compounds (iron (III) citrate and iron (III) pyrophosphate), the diffraction pattern does not have characteristic diffraction lines. Food supplements containing crystalline iron compounds have a melting point close to the melting point of pure iron compounds. The presence of excipients was found to affect the shapes and positions of the endothermic peaks significantly. Widening of endothermic peaks and changes in their position were observed, as well as exothermic peaks indicating crystallization of amorphous compounds. Weight loss was determined for all dietary supplements tested. Analysis of the DTG curves showed that the thermal decomposition of most food supplements takes place in several steps. The results obtained by a combination of both simple, relatively fast and reliable XRPD and DSC/DTG methods are helpful in determining phase composition, pharmaceutical abnormalities or by detecting the presence of the correct polymorphic form.


Introduction
Iron is one of the essential elemental nutrients involved in many key cellular processes. On the other hand, iron is responsible, for example, for oxidative damage to lipids, proteins or DNA [1]. The low-energy barrier between Fe(II)/Fe(III) oxidation states is responsible for crucial metabolic reactions, such as cellular respiration and oxygen transport, but also the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2]. Iron metabolism is therefore precisely regulated in the human body by various mechanisms. Due to impaired homeostasis, two conditions are possible: iron overload or deficiency. The first may result from frequent transfusions or genetic disorders [3]. Iron deficiency is a typical impact of malnutrition Therefore, fast and efficient methods for evaluating OIS ingredients are needed to assess quality and safety; ideally, solid-state analytical techniques avoid any changes in composition during the analysis. This work continues our previous works focusing on the examination of dietary supplements and drugs using X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) [26,27]. This work aimed to identify iron compounds declared by the manufacturer as food supplements and to determine whether the product meets the manufacturer's claims. For the study, 31 popular and often-purchased dietary supplements containing iron compounds were selected from the Polish market. According to the main component of iron, they can be divided into iron (II) gluconate, iron (II) fumarate, iron (III) pyrophosphate, iron (II) bisglycinate and iron (III) citrate. Their formulations cover a single active ingredient and a complex preparation with adjuvants, plant or vegetable extracts (e.g., beetroot extract). Notably, the analysis of such complex formulations, which tend to be dark, not wholly soluble and prone to autocatalytic redox degradation, would be complicated using the approaches of classical liquid analytical chemistry.

X-ray Qualitative Phase Analysis
The X-ray qualitative phase analysis allows us to determine which crystalline phases are present in the investigated samples. Each polycrystalline phase gives a characteristic X-ray pattern with a specific position and intensity of diffraction lines. Moreover, each polycrystalline phase in the mixture provides its X-ray pattern, despite other phases coexisting. Therefore, such patterns may play the role of "fingerprints" in identifying substances. The identification technique consists in finding the phases whose reflections are consistent with the values for the tested material. The XRD method identifies the present phases at an amount below 1%. The X-ray detection limit is in the range of 0.1 to 1% wt. per phase, while the limit of detection (LOD) is approximately 1%. The details are described in [28,29]. These detection levels are suitable for typical compositions of OIS that can be found in the marker.
Qualitative X-ray analysis compares experimental diffraction data such as 2θ diffraction angles, d hkl interplanar distances and relative intensities with the data from the ICDD database [30]. Values of d hkl interplanar distances were calculated based on the Bragg-Wulff equation [28]. Based on [31,32], it is assumed that the difference (|∆2θ|) in the position of the diffraction line (given a value of 2θ angle) between the tested substance and the standard presented in the database should not be greater than 0.2 • . A difference above 0.2 • indicates that the tested product may be a counterfeit. Table 1 and Figure 1 present the results of XRPD analysis for iron (II) gluconate and iron (II) fumarate. The given crystal data have been obtained using the LeBail method.  Analysis of a diffraction pattern and obtained crystal data of pure iron (II) fumarate perfectly aligned with the PDF card 00-0062-1294 [30]. Similarly, crystal data and diffraction pattern of pure iron (II) gluconate are in good agreement with the data presented in [33]. The X-ray analysis was done for iron (II) gluconate monohydrate and iron (II) gluconate dihydrate. The diffraction pattern for both compounds is very similar. The XRPD method does not distinguish both forms of iron (II) gluconate. The other iron compounds included in the studied dietary supplements: iron (III) citrate and iron (III) pyrophosphate are amorphous substances. Structural parameters cannot be determined for these compounds. Although the diffraction pattern of iron (II) bisglycinate indicates amorphous properties, the diffractogram of the pure iron (II) bisglycinate showed a characteristic shape with two diffraction lines ( Figure 2). The diffraction pattern of iron (II) bisglycinate indicated partly amorphous properties. The diffractogram of the pure iron (II) bisglycinate showed a characteristic shape with two diffraction lines ( Figure 2). It allowed us to determine the values of 2θ angles: 16.5449° and 22.6979° and to calculate the interplanar distance dhkl: 5.3536Å and 3.9143Å, respectively. Values of dhkl interplanar distances for all tested supplements were calculated based on the Bragg-Wulff equation [28]. Analysis of a diffraction pattern and obtained crystal data of pure iron (II) fumarate perfectly aligned with the PDF card 00-0062-1294 [30]. Similarly, crystal data and diffraction pattern of pure iron (II) gluconate are in good agreement with the data presented in [33]. The X-ray analysis was done for iron (II) gluconate monohydrate and iron (II) gluconate dihydrate. The diffraction pattern for both compounds is very similar. The XRPD method does not distinguish both forms of iron (II) gluconate. The other iron compounds included in the studied dietary supplements: iron (III) citrate and iron (III) pyrophosphate are amorphous substances. Structural parameters cannot be determined for these compounds. Although the diffraction pattern of iron (II) bisglycinate indicates amorphous properties, the diffractogram of the pure iron (II) bisglycinate showed a characteristic shape with two diffraction lines ( Figure 2). The diffraction pattern of iron (II) bisglycinate indicated partly amorphous properties. The diffractogram of the pure iron (II) bisglycinate showed a characteristic shape with two diffraction lines ( Figure 2). It allowed us to determine the values of 2θ angles: 16.5449 • and 22.6979 • and to calculate the interplanar distance d hkl : 5.3536 Å and 3.9143 Å, respectively. Values of d hkl interplanar distances for all tested supplements were calculated based on the Bragg-Wulff equation [28].    Position of diffraction lines (2θ angles) and the calculated values of interplanar distances d hkl have values close to data obtained for pure iron (II) gluconate (Table 2). |∆2θ| values were lower than 0.2 • , confirming the presence of iron (II) gluconate in studied dietary supplements. For some supplements, only deviations in intensities of diffraction lines were observed. The intensity of the registered diffraction line of the phase in the mixture depended on the content of a given phase, its crystalline structure, the nature of coexisting phases, and the crystallites' orientation [27].   (Table 3). of iron (II) fumarate (C4H2FeO4) are depicted in all diffraction patterns. Most of the diffraction patterns also show diffraction lines derived from vitamin C. The positions of these lines are consistent with the PDF card 00-004-0308. The exception is the Iron APTEO supplement, which does not contain vitamin C, following the manufacturer's declaration. |∆2θ| values were lower than 0.2°, confirming the presence of this component in the tested drugs (Table 3).      (Table 4). For the two supplements: Chella Flex and Biofer, the diffraction lines originating from iron (II) bisglycinate are hard to identify. The crystalline substances present in these two supplements appear as high-intensity diffraction lines. They are probably composed of grains with a privileged crystallographic direction. For this reason, the low-intensity diffraction lines derived from iron (II) bisglycinate are difficult to register and almost invisible in the diffraction pattern. Although these lines are feeble, we can notice their trace on diffraction pattern, which indicates the presence of iron (II) bisglycinate in the composition of investigated dietary supplements ( Figure 5c). Diffraction lines derivating from vitamin C are in good agreement with the PDF card 00-004-0308.      Because iron (III) pyrophosphate and iron (III) citrate are amorphous substances ( Figure 2), it is impossible to identify these components using the XRPD method. The lack of clear diffraction lines characterizes the x-ray pattern of amorphous substances, and the counting intensity is very lower than for crystalline samples. There is a high background noise level concerning the maximum intensity. A particular procedure can be used to determine the amorphous amount in the mixture, for example, full-pattern fitting method with a simulated amorphous content (using Rietveld method).

No. of Diffraction Line
It was only possible to identify the diffraction lines from the crystalline substances present in these supplements (Figure 6a Because iron (III) pyrophosphate and iron (III) citrate are amorphous substances (Figure 2), it is impossible to identify these components using the XRPD method. The lack of clear diffraction lines characterizes the x-ray pattern of amorphous substances, and the counting intensity is very lower than for crystalline samples. There is a high background noise level concerning the maximum intensity. A particular procedure can be used to determine the amorphous amount in the mixture, for example, full-pattern fitting method with a simulated amorphous content (using Rietveld method).
It was only possible to identify the diffraction lines from the crystalline substances present in these supplements (Figure 6a-c). Diffractograms of tested dietary supplements showed diffraction lines derived from other components, for example, sorbitol, vitamin C, cellulose or TiO2. The lines visible for the diffraction pattern of dietary supplements with iron (III) pyrophosphate, derived from sorbitol, were lined with the PDF 00-039-1923 card, while those with the vitamin C were lined with the PDF 00-004-0308 card. On the diffraction pattern for dietary supplements: Iron citrate Swanson, the widened line between 20-25° of 2θ indicates cellulose. The strongest diffraction line (2θ = 25.61°) confirmed the TiO2 presence (Figure 6c). A similar phenomenon, confirming cellulose's presence, is observed for other dietary supplements, for example, Iron APTEO, Ferr C, Restonum LS or Organic Iron Aliness.
On diffractograms, unidentified lines are observed. It is probably because the crystalline phase detectability depends on the mixture type in which this phase occurs. It is related to the change of the absorption coefficient ratio of the phase and the mixture as a whole * * ( * -mass absorption coefficient of the phase j, * -mass coefficient of the mixture) and the overlapping of the reflections of the coexisting phases.

Thermal Analysis
Thermal measurements using DSC/TG (DSC-Differential Scanning Calorimetry, TG-Thermogravimetry) were carried out for pure iron compounds and 21 selected dietary supplements. The technical details of these measurements are described in [27]. The remaining samples of dietary supplements exploded during the measurement and posed a threat to the equipment. The DSC/TG data are presented in Tables 5-9, while only the temperatures connected with DTG maximum are shown in figures. On the TG curve, steps related to the change in mass during heating or cooling could be observed. These steps are often blurred and may overlap when several reactions occur in a sample in succession. A DTG curve can be generated based on the TG curve, making it easier to distinguish overlapping thermal effects and accurately determine each reaction's start and end temperature associated with a mass change.

Thermal Analysis
Thermal measurements using DSC/TG (DSC-Differential Scanning Calorimetry, TG-Thermogravimetry) were carried out for pure iron compounds and 21 selected dietary supplements. The technical details of these measurements are described in [27]. The remaining samples of dietary supplements exploded during the measurement and posed a threat to the equipment. The DSC/TG data are presented in Tables 5-9, while only the temperatures connected with DTG maximum are shown in figures. On the TG curve, steps related to the change in mass during heating or cooling could be observed. These steps are often blurred and may overlap when several reactions occur in a sample in succession. A DTG curve can be generated based on the TG curve, making it easier to distinguish overlapping thermal effects and accurately determine each reaction's start and end temperature associated with a mass change.   On diffractograms, unidentified lines are observed. It is probably because the crystalline phase detectability depends on the mixture type in which this phase occurs. It is related to the change of the absorption coefficient ratio of the phase and the mixture as a whole µ * j µ * (µ * j -mass absorption coefficient of the phase j, µ * -mass coefficient of the mixture) and the overlapping of the reflections of the coexisting phases.

Thermal Analysis
Thermal measurements using DSC/TG (DSC-Differential Scanning Calorimetry, TG-Thermogravimetry) were carried out for pure iron compounds and 21 selected dietary supplements. The technical details of these measurements are described in [27]. The remaining samples of dietary supplements exploded during the measurement and posed a threat to the equipment. The DSC/TG data are presented in Tables 5-9, while only the temperatures connected with DTG maximum are shown in figures. On the TG curve, steps related to the change in mass during heating or cooling could be observed. These steps are often blurred and may overlap when several reactions occur in a sample in succession. A DTG curve can be generated based on the TG curve, making it easier to distinguish overlapping thermal effects and accurately determine each reaction's start and end temperature associated with a mass change.   Table 5 presents thermal parameters for the examined iron compounds obtained by DSC/TG.
The DSC curves of iron compounds showed endothermic peaks indicating the tested samples' ongoing melting processes and thermal decomposition. One endothermic peak was observed for iron (II) fumarate at T = 460.6 • C, indicating thermal decomposition. The TG/DTG curve for pure iron (II) fumarate shows its stability up to a temperature of 460.6 • C. At this temperature, the carbonic matter decomposes into gaseous products indicating that the thermal composition was complete (Figure 7a The DSC curves of iron compounds showed endothermic peaks indicating the ed samples' ongoing melting processes and thermal decomposition. One endothe peak was observed for iron (II) fumarate at T = 460.6 °C, indicating thermal decomp tion. The TG/DTG curve for pure iron (II) fumarate shows its stability up to a temp ture of 460.6 °C. At this temperature, the carbonic matter decomposes into gas products indicating that the thermal composition was complete (Figure 7a).
Although the X-ray analysis does not distinguish the hydrated form of iron (II) conate, the DSC/TG analysis of pure iron (II) gluconate monohydrate and iron (II) conate dehydrate has shown apparent differences (Figure 7b). For iron (II) gluco monohydrate, the first endothermal peak caused by dehydration occurred at 138. 8 The second endothermal peak occurred at 189.9 °C, pointing to the thermal decomp Although the X-ray analysis does not distinguish the hydrated form of iron (II) gluconate, the DSC/TG analysis of pure iron (II) gluconate monohydrate and iron (II) gluconate dehydrate has shown apparent differences (Figure 7b). For iron (II) gluconate monohydrate, the first endothermal peak caused by dehydration occurred at 138.8 • C. The second endothermal peak occurred at 189.9 • C, pointing to the thermal decomposition of iron (II) gluconate monohydrate (Table 5). For iron (II) gluconate dihydrate, the first endothermal peak connecting with dehydration occurred at 148.3 • C. The second endothermal peak occurred at 195.3 • C, indicating the thermal decomposition of iron (II) gluconate dihydrate (Table 5). DTG curves suggest that, for both compounds, the thermal decomposition takes place at the same temperature~200 • C (Figure 7b). The loss of weight is more significant for iron (II) gluconate monohydrate (Table 5).
DSC data for iron (III) pyrophosphate are not available in the literature. Still, our investigations have shown an endothermic peak at 275.0 • C, which is in good accordance with the DTG minimum (Table 5, Figure 7a). The rate of decomposition is the fastest at this temperature.
Similarly, the melting point of iron (III) citrate is not found in the literature. Still, our measurements showed the presence of two endothermic peaks, the first at 201.9 • C, and the second at 332.2 • C. DTG curve indicate that the decomposition of this sample took place in two stages, the fastest at 203.2 • C. For iron (II) bisglycinate, the endothermic peaks were not observed on the DSC curve (Figure 7b). However, the TG/DTG curves indicate the process of decomposition, which takes place in several steps. Figure 8 shows the results of thermal analysis of dietary supplements containing iron (II) gluconate. In this group of dietary supplements, it was observed that, for the Ascofer, Fe-Miron and Ferrous gluconate Puritan's Pride supplements, the shape of the DSC curve is close to the DSC curve for pure iron (II) gluconate monohydrate. It was observed that the first endothermic peak appeared in the temperature range 137-140 • C, while the second endothermic peak from iron (II) gluconate was visible in the temperature range 181-194 • C. For the Floridax supplement, no endothermic peaks were observed, only a weight loss (TG curve) of approx. 70% was observed. The DTG curve of Floridax is in line with the DTG curve of Ascofer ( Figure 8). Both supplements decompose at~200 • C.   Figure 9 and Table 7 present the results of DSC/TG measurements for dietary sup- On the DSC curve for Fe-Miron, the exothermic peak was observed at~340 • C. It suggests the crystallisation process of amorphous substances present in their composition. The presence of an amorphous substance is confirmed by an increased background in the diffraction pattern (Figure 3a). Further increase of temperature causes mass loss and complete decomposition of investigated supplements.

Thermal Analysis of Dietary Supplements Containing Iron (II) Gluconate
The endothermic peaks at 58.42 • C and 59.11 • C observed on the DSC curves for Ascofer and Fe-Miron, respectively, confirm the presence of fatty acids declared by the producers ( Table 6). The DTG curves of investigated supplements suggest that the decomposition process runs in several steps. Figure 9 and Table 7  The small endothermic peaks were observed on the DSC curves at a temperature close to one for the pure iron (II) fumarate, i.e., 450 °C. The position of these peaks is in line with the data for pure iron (II) fumarate (Table 5). However, the DSC shapes for investigated dietary supplements contain endothermic peaks from other substances included in the tested supplements. In the mixture, the maximum endothermic peaks are obtained for different temperatures than for pure substances. The change in the melting point of additional substances in a combination depends on its amount and, more precisely, on its mole fraction value.

Thermal Analysis of Dietary Supplements Containing Iron (II) Fumarate
It should be noted that the shape of the TG/DTG curves indicate that the thermal decomposition of the tested supplements occurs in several stages. For all samples, the last minimum in the DTG curve appears at about 450°C. It points to the complete decomposition of these supplements at a temperature close to the pure iron fumarate-450 °C (Table 5). Exothermic peaks visible in the DSC curves may indicate crystallisation of amorphous components in the tested supplements. It is also evidenced by the increased background in their diffraction image (Figure 4a).  The small endothermic peaks were observed on the DSC curves at a temperature close to one for the pure iron (II) fumarate, i.e., 450 • C. The position of these peaks is in line with the data for pure iron (II) fumarate (Table 5). However, the DSC shapes for investigated dietary supplements contain endothermic peaks from other substances included in the tested supplements. In the mixture, the maximum endothermic peaks are obtained for different temperatures than for pure substances. The change in the melting point of additional substances in a combination depends on its amount and, more precisely, on its mole fraction value.
It should be noted that the shape of the TG/DTG curves indicate that the thermal decomposition of the tested supplements occurs in several stages. For all samples, the last minimum in the DTG curve appears at about 450 • C. It points to the complete decomposition of these supplements at a temperature close to the pure iron fumarate-450 • C (Table 5). Exothermic peaks visible in the DSC curves may indicate crystallisation of amorphous components in the tested supplements. It is also evidenced by the increased background in their diffraction image (Figure 4a).

Thermal Analysis of Dietary Supplements Containing Iron (III) Pyrophosphate
Although DSC analysis revealed a small endothermic peak at 275 • C, for iron (III) pyrophosphate, on the DSC curves for dietary supplements, endothermic peaks originate from other substances were observed ( Figure 10); it can be seen in Table 8 that, for Actiferol, Dicofer Junior and SiderAl Forte, the maximum endothermic peak occurs in the range of 84-95 • C, confirming the presence of sorbitol (m.p. ≈ 95 • C), which, according to the manufacturer's declaration, is in good accordance with diffraction pattern (Figure 6a-c).
Although DSC analysis revealed a small endothermic peak at 275 °C, for iron (III) pyrophosphate, on the DSC curves for dietary supplements, endothermic peaks originate from other substances were observed ( Figure 10); it can be seen in Table 8 that, for Actiferol, Dicofer Junior and SiderAl Forte, the maximum endothermic peak occurs in the range of 84-95 °C, confirming the presence of sorbitol (m.p. ≈ 95 °C), which, according to the manufacturer's declaration, is in good accordance with diffraction pattern (Figure 6a-c). The TG/DTG curves indicate that the decomposition temperature for investigated supplements took place in several steps. The exception is SiderAl Forte, for which the process of thermal decomposition took place only in one step, by about 290°C. A slightly different phase composition may cause the different behavior of SiderAl Forte compared to other supplements, especially SiderAl Folic. The shape of the DTG curves for the two supplements was similar, although a split into two peaks is visible for SiderAl Folic. The presence of other substances (e.g., B vitamins, vitamin D) in this supplement causes decomposition in two stages. The SiderAl Forte supplement does not contain these vitamins in its composition, hence the different shape of the DTG curve, indicating that the decomposition of this supplement takes place immediately at the temperature of ~290 °C.  The TG/DTG curves indicate that the decomposition temperature for investigated supplements took place in several steps. The exception is SiderAl Forte, for which the process of thermal decomposition took place only in one step, by about 290 • C. A slightly different phase composition may cause the different behavior of SiderAl Forte compared to other supplements, especially SiderAl Folic. The shape of the DTG curves for the two supplements was similar, although a split into two peaks is visible for SiderAl Folic. The presence of other substances (e.g., B vitamins, vitamin D) in this supplement causes decomposition in two stages. The SiderAl Forte supplement does not contain these vitamins in its composition, hence the different shape of the DTG curve, indicating that the decomposition of this supplement takes place immediately at the temperature of~290 • C.

Thermal Analysis of Dietary Supplements Containing Iron (II) Bisglycinate and Iron (III) Citrate
The dietary supplements containing iron (II) bisglycinate: Balanced Iron Viridian, Biofer, Chella Ferr Forte, Chella Ferr Med, Chella Flex, Ferrum DOZ, Szelazo SR, X-Ferr, Gentle Iron and Iron NOW have been measured using DSC/TG method. The results are presented in Figure 11a-c, and in Table 9.
The shape of the DSC curves is different from the DSC curve for pure iron (II) bisglycinate. It is connected with the amorphous state of iron (II) bisglycinate and other substances on the composition of dietary supplements. For dietary supplements, Chella Flex, X-Ferr, Chella Ferr Forte, Chella Ferr Med, Gentle Iron, Iron NOW, endothermic peaks are visible on DSC curves, for which thermal parameters could be determined (Table 9). These peaks originate from crystalline substances contained in dietary supplements. For all tested dietary supplements containing iron (II) bisglycinate, the TG curves showed a weight loss in the range of 50-60%. The beginning of the sample melting process can be found in the DTG curves. In most cases, the melting process began at lower temperatures. It occurred in several steps, except for supplements Szelazo SR, Iron DOZ and Balanced Iron Viridian, where only one peak is visible in the DTG curves, indicating the melting point of the investigated supplement.  Figure 11a-c, and in Table 9.   The DSC curve for dietary supplements Iron citrate Swanson shows two endothermic peaks ( Figure 12). These peaks occur at different temperatures in comparison with the pure iron (III) citrate. It was probably connected with the presence of other crystalline substances in the composition of this supplement. It is in good agreement with the diffraction pattern for Iron citrate Swanson (Figure 6c). The DSC curve for dietary supplements Iron citrate Swanson shows two endothermic peaks ( Figure 12). These peaks occur at different temperatures in comparison with the pure iron (III) citrate. It was probably connected with the presence of other crystalline substances in the composition of this supplement. It is in good agreement with the diffraction pattern for Iron citrate Swanson (Figure 6c).

Materials
The research was conducted for 31 dietary supplements containing iron ions in various compounds: iron (II) gluconate, iron (II) fumarate, iron (II) bisglycinate, iron (III) pyrophosphate and iron (III) citrate. They can be purchased at a pharmacy, store or online. All tested drugs are summarized in Table 10. The table includes the data declared by the manufacturer: the type and amount of iron compounds. Pure iron compounds were used for comparative studies: iron (II) gluconate monohydrate (Merck Life Science, Darmstadt, Germany), iron (II) gluconate dihydrate (Merck), iron (II) fumarate (Merck), iron (III) pyrophosphate (Merck) and iron (III) citrate (Merck). Iron (II) bisglycinate was isolated from the X-Ferr (Galena) supplement.

Materials
The research was conducted for 31 dietary supplements containing iron ions in various compounds: iron (II) gluconate, iron (II) fumarate, iron (II) bisglycinate, iron (III) pyrophosphate and iron (III) citrate. They can be purchased at a pharmacy, store or online. All tested drugs are summarized in Table 10. The table includes the data declared by the manufacturer: the type and amount of iron compounds. Pure iron compounds were used for comparative studies: iron (II) gluconate monohydrate (Merck Life Science, Darmstadt, Germany), iron (II) gluconate dihydrate (Merck), iron (II) fumarate (Merck), iron (III) pyrophosphate (Merck) and iron (III) citrate (Merck). Iron (II) bisglycinate was isolated from the X-Ferr (Galena) supplement.  Excipients such as starch, cellulose, ascorbic acid, etc., are omitted in the table because the primary purpose was to identify iron compounds as the main substance in the investigated dietary supplements. However, for some supplements, the diffraction lines from declared other substances were determined due to the high intensity of these lines.

Methods
All dietary supplements and standard substances were studied using X-ray analysis (XRPD-X-ray Powder Diffraction) and thermal analysis (DSC/TGA, DSC-Differential Scanning Calorimetry, TGA-Thermogravimetry). X-ray analysis was performed using D5000 (Siemens, Munich, Germany) and PW3050 (X'Pert Philips, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) polycrystalline diffractometers. All samples were ground thoroughly in an agate mortar to obtain a high degree of homogeneity. The values of the interplanar distances d hkl were calculated based on the Bragg Equation (1): where: d hkl -interplanar distance, n-reflection order, λ-wavelength, θ-angle of reflection.
Because the strongest diffraction lines are observed at low angles in the obtained diffraction patterns, all diffraction images are presented for the angular range 2θ: 5-40 • . The diffractometric data from the ICDD PDF4 database (Table 11) was used to compare the experimental data with the standards. The DSC/TG measurements were carried out using Setaram Thermo analyser Labsys Evo. The XRD and DSC/TG methods and their technical details are described in [27].

Conclusions
The XRPD made it possible to state that the active ingredients declared by the manufacturers in their specifications were present in the analyzed products containing crystalline and semi-crystalline iron compounds iron (III) pyrophosphate and iron (III) citrate, as amorphous substances do not give a clear diffraction pattern. XRPD cannot verify the presence of these compounds in the tested supplements. Analysis of the DSC and DTG curves showed that the OIS containing crystalline iron compounds had a melting point close to the melting point of the pure compounds. DSC/DTG studies for iron (II) gluconate monohydrate and iron (II) gluconate dihydrate distinguished these hydrates and confirmed that iron (II) gluconate monohydrate was present in the tested dietary supplements. Based on the DTG curves, it can be concluded that all tested OIS containing iron (II) gluconate are subject to thermal decomposition in the temperature range 180-200 • C.
Similarly, preparations containing iron (II) fumarate mixed with other crystalline bulk excipients in other compounds. Therefore, several endothermic peaks were observed in the DSC curves. These supplements thermally decomposed at a temperature of about 450 • C, which is visible on the DTG curves and is in good agreement with the decomposition temperature of pure iron fumarate (~460 • C). DSC curves for amorphous iron (III) citrate and iron (III) pyrophosphate showed small endothermic peaks, consistent with DTG curves, indicating an ongoing decomposition reaction. Dietary supplements containing amorphous iron compounds also contained crystalline substances. The endothermic peaks observed in the DSC curves were derived from these components. DTG curves show that decomposition occurs in several stages depending on the supplement's composition.
These observations were consistent with XRPD analysis, revealing many diffraction lines derived from crystalline substances. The DSC curves of the tested supplements showed exothermic peaks, indicating the presence of an amorphous phase that crystallizes under high temperatures. The weight loss observed in the TG curves and the changes in the DTG curves confirm the ongoing decomposition reactions. The DSC curve for iron (II) bisglycinate showed the presence of an amorphous component (visible broad exothermic peak). Vast endothermic peaks were also visible on the DSC curves of the tested OIS, confirming the existence of this compound in the supplement composition. Table 12 clearly provides basic observations. The specific findings are as follows: for supplements 1-6 (crystalline iron (II) gluconate) and supplements 7-13 (crystalline iron (II) fumarate) the iron compounds were proved by XPRD, as well as by thermal analysis, while in supplements 19-30 (amorphous iron (II) bisglycinate) and supplement 31 (amorphous iron (III) citrate), the iron compounds were not possible to determine by XRPD but were proved by thermal analysis. Iron compounds in supplements 14-18 (semicrystalline iron (III) pyrophosphate) were not clearly detectable by XPRD but were proved by thermal analysis. Based on research performed by thermoanalytical and X-ray techniques, it can be concluded that the combination of both methods can determine the phase composition of iron supplements and can especially confirm the presence of the main component. The choice of the behavior of the tested OIS at different temperatures allowed for defining the temperature limits below which the analyzed substances can be processed without changing their physicochemical properties. The obtained results can also be helpful as a guide for testing the stability of dietary supplements and can be used to detect inconsistencies in their phase composition. It can be stated that the results obtained from XRPD and DSC/DTG measurements correlate well with each other.  Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.